Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Scene Questions for Godot

The scene I'm using to derive questions from is one of the first scenes involving Vladimir, Estragon, and a new character named Pozzo. In this scene, Pozzo starts questioning Didi and Gogo as to why they referred to Pozzo as another person named Godot. I've pasted it below: 

POZZO:
(peremptory). Who is Godot?
ESTRAGON:
Godot?
POZZO:
You took me for Godot.
VLADIMIR:
Oh no, Sir, not for an instant, Sir.
POZZO:
Who is he?
VLADIMIR:
Oh he's a . . . he's a kind of acquaintance.
ESTRAGON:
Nothing of the kind, we hardly know him.
VLADIMIR:
True . . . we don't know him very well . . . but all the same . . .
ESTRAGON:
Personally, I wouldn't even know him if I saw him.
POZZO:
You took me for him.
ESTRAGON:
(recoiling before Pozzo). That's to say . . . you understand . . . the dusk . . . the strain . . . waiting . . . I confess . . . I imagined . . . for a second . . .
POZZO:
Waiting? So you were waiting for him?
VLADIMIR:
Well you see—
POZZO:
Here? On my land?
VLADIMIR:
We didn't intend any harm.
ESTRAGON:
We meant well.
POZZO:
The road is free to all.
VLADIMIR:
That's how we looked at it.
POZZO:
It's a disgrace. But there you are.
ESTRAGON:
Nothing we can do about it. 


15 Questions:
1. Why does Estragon still think that Pozzo is Godot? (meaning/knowing)
2.  How could Didi and Gogo arrange a meeting with Godot if they don't know him very well? (patience/promises)
3. If Didi and Gogo have been waiting for Godot at this same location, wouldn't they have already met Pozzo since he does rule the land? (confusion)
4. If Estragon was involved with arranging the meeting with Godot, wouldn't he know what he looks like? (Deceiving, Uncertainty)
5. Why is Gogo rather apologetic towards Pozzo after mixing up Pozzo with Godot? (Confusion, Hardship)
6. If Pozzo owns the land, how could it be free to all? Wouldn't he want to charge people for use of his land? (Confusion, Poverty)
7. Does Vladimir seem to remember what Godot looks like? (Deceiving, Uncertainty)
8. Because Vladimir seems to be quite hesitant in saying his words towards Pozzo, does Didi know more about the situation than Gogo? (Mental Hardship, Language and How it's used)
9. Even though Pozzo mentions that the road is free, why is he upset at Didi believing that it was free? (self-interest, uncertainty) 
10. Is it possible that Didi actually knows Godot, and instead, he is waiting to get rid of Gogo to go towards Godot? (Deceiving, self-interest)
11. Why does Estragon seem quite lost in this scene? (mental hardship, confusion) 
12. Why does Pozzo seem upset at Didi and Gogo just waiting on his land? (self-interest, deceiving) 
13. Was Estragon someone involved in arranging the meeting with Godot, or was it all of Didi's ideas? (self-interest, mental hardship, adulthood) 
14. How could Didi and Gogo mean well, by just waiting by a willow tree? (uncertainty, suffering)
15. Could Pozzo be their Godot? (meaning/knowing, uncertainty, redemption/salvation) 

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Estragon Questions (10/23/14)

BOLD= Chlyde's updates to group notes. 
1. what is your character like?
  1. hard headed
  2. distrustworthy with everyone except Didi
  3. Childish
  4. Unintelligent
  b.how does he not act?
  1. mature
  2. smart
  3. adult

2. objects your character interacts with?
  • boot
    • tries to remove it, does so in the end of act 1. (pg. 7, 34 <- old edition of book)
  • chicken bone
    • sees Lucky with it, and wants to eat it. (pg. 18 <- old edition of book)
  • carrot
    • would like to eat it, eventually gets one. (pg. 14 <- old edition of book)
  • turnip
    • was about to be eaten, until a carrot was found. (pg. 14 <- old edition of book)
  • willow tree
    • considers hanging himself in act 2
    • it is the meet up spot
  • belt
    • how he would hang himself
    • holds his pants up in act 2

  • bag
    • he wonders why Lucky continues to hold it. (pg. 27 <- old edition of book)
3. describe how your character interacts with other characters. use examples.
  • repetitive in words (pg. 26,52-53)
    • "like leave...like leaves.."
  • goes off topic, on a tangent. (pg. 23 <- old edition of book)
    • "the circus, the music-hall, the circus"
4. How does your character change? how do they act in scene 1? act in scene 2?
  • physically
    • moves spots
    • takes off trousers
  • mentally
    • doesn't change (stays childish in both acts)
  • emotionally
    • he retains a somber tone for the majority of both acts, but there are a few instances where he is happy. 

5. How does your character make sense of his world? what does he think? and how does he think?

Estragon sees the world like a playground, where he can do what he wants, because this area is for him to mess around in. One example of this idea is represented through the situation that Estragon describes about "throwing himself into the Rhone" (pg. 35 <- old version page number)

He thinks more about himself, or the situations that seem to grab his attention more, because they do not require too much thinking compared to worrying about others or considering if an action is "right" or "wrong".

He thinks like a child because he values human interaction and materialistic ideas more than anything. His mannerisms and lack of adult behavior apparently give this idea that he might look like an adult, but he does not seem like an adult. 



Waiting For Godot Character Analysis

Character Focus: Estragon

How do we get to know Estragon?
We are able to gain information from Estragon in many ways. The easiest way to find out about Estragon is through the lines that he says in the play "Waiting For Godot." One example of knowing his character through his words is the lines where he mentions a God or more specifically, Jesus. Because he continuously compares himself to being God, with specific instances including "Christ [went barefoot]" and "All my life I've compared myself to him" (Beckett, 34), showcasing this type of depth for Estragon's thinking, where he feels more than just a typical guy. While it does seem a bit out of this world, it provides some clues as to how Estragon is as a person, besides being a friend of Vladimir. 
How are they like?
Estragon is like a young and innocent child, or a person that does not know much about life, since he seems to act quite childish. Various examples in the play support this idea, such as the arguments that he has with Vladimir, sounding like a bratty child that cannot have what he wants. 
How are they not like?
Estragon is definitely not like a grown man or a mature person. Estragon does not seem mature, let alone being able to focus on a conversation for a long period of time. When it comes to his scenes or moments involving Pozzo or Lucky, he does not appear to be focused on the people, but instead, the inanimate objects that the two secondary characters are involved with, such as a bag or a bone of a chicken.
Any other information?
Estragon is an impatient person, due to the fact that he does not enjoy waiting for Godot, nor does he like being rather stationary in one location, nearby a tree that is probably a willow tree. Estragon is also quite rash, never thinking too clearly before going through with situations. 

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Waiting For Godot HW

1.
-Godot is someone that Didi and Gogo seem to be familiar with, but they don't know all about him. (like how we know we live on a planet, but we don't really know all about the planet.)
-Didi and Gogo might look like the typical person, but there seems to be more than what meets the eye. (with the Power of 10, we might be seeing a couple having a picnic, but there are little molecules involved in their time together).
-Just like the Power of 10 video, it is taking a long time to figure out who Didi and Gogo really are as people, just like how it took a long time to figure out that our planet is more than just a planet. 
-With the Power of 10 video, we needed additional materials such as technology in order to see beyond the surface, and we need more than just our eyes reading pages in order to understand this play that we are studying. 
-The Power of 10 video seems to mention that it is difficult to actually know what is in front of you, just like how Estragon starts to question the location of where he is actually dwelling at the very moment. 
-When it comes to the Power of 10 video, everything appears to look the same, but in actuality, everything undergoes small changes, just like how Act 1 and Act 2 seemed similar, but actually had a few differences. 
-In relation to the Power of 10 video, the couple is enjoying a lazy day and lounging around, which is implied in this play, that Didi and Gogo are grazing around, waiting for Godot. 
-A particular moment in Waiting For Godot relates to the Power of 10 video, which is the fact that the two main characters in both articles are sharing in food, with the couple enjoying food from a lovely picnic basket, and Didi and Gogo partaking in some veggies from Didi's bag. 
-In the Power of 10 video, the solar system looks like empty space, but looking deeply into it results in something more, just like how Waiting For Godot might seem like a story with no sense, but there is some deep stuff happening within it. 
-Relating to the Power of 10 video, there seems to be no end to this waiting for Didi and Gogo, just like how there seems to be no end to how small the universe actually is. 

2. I think that Pozzo and Lucky are good characters to have in this play. These two secondary characters add some information about how Didi and Gogo are as people, which is good. I doubt that we would be able to know more about Didi and Gogo if not for the Pozzo and Lucky interaction that occurred during both acts. Some of my favorite moments involving Pozzo and Lucky include the "keeping the dog around" scene during the first act. Even though Lucky might not seem like the best assistant that Pozzo has ever had, Pozzo is still willing to keep Lucky around because Lucky is actually dependent on Pozzo. Something noteworthy that I noticed within this play is that Lucky does not necessarily have to be Pozzo's servant. Pozzo actually learned about some "beautiful things" (Beckett, 22) from Lucky, implying that Lucky does have a brain despite the brawn that he has only been able to showcase. If he actually has some intelligence, there must be a reason as to why Lucky has resorted to belittling himself as Pozzo's servant. 

3. Didi is different from Gogo because Didi seems to be better at memorizing what goes on in his daily life compared to Gogo, because Gogo cannot even seem to recall the events that went on in Act 1. Didi is also different from Gogo because Didi is very focused on his promises and goals that he has made, compared to Gogo, who does not even recall setting an arrangement with Godot and also constantly brings up wanting to leave the meetup location. Another example that showcases how Didi is different from Gogo is the way that they think, specifically with Gogo thinking about being God-like, whereas Didi thinks about himself more realistically. 

4. Didi and Gogo are discussing if they should wait to meet up with this Godot person, because they apparently scheduled to meet with Godot at a certain location at a certain time, but this person has yet to show up at the respective time or location. For whatever reason, these two guys arranged to meet up with someone, yet they have a very little recollection of setting up the meeting or even of who this person actually is. They continue to discuss this Godot person because a meetup with him was "planned" to occur, but the plan is not coming to fruition. 

5. My life is like Didi or Gogo for various reasons. Sometimes my life goes like Didi's, where I lead someone else into doing something, convincing them to partake in a certain action. Sometimes my life can be like Gogo's, which is following someone else, listening to what they have to say instead of my own words, because that person's ideas make more sense than mine. Other times where my life can be similar to Didi or Gogo include wanting to eat other people's food (Gogo), wearing ill-fitted attire (Gogo), worrying about people I know very little about (Didi), or not being picky with what food I have available (Didi). 

6. This play demonstrates the social differences between people with and without a good memory. Based on what this play does, it showcases that people with a good memory seem to be more intelligent and attentive, while people lacking a good memory seem be to be not that smart and unfocused. Another idea that the play seems to showcase is that true friendship occurs despite the trials and tribulations that can occur between two people. Even though Didi and Gogo had a number of confrontations in the play, ranging from not listening to each other to arguing about Godot or some other factor, the end of each act was the same: Didi and Gogo waiting for Godot and still being friends. Besides the two other messages previously mentioned, this play also raises to attention that humans just want other humans around, no matter if that other person might upset you sometimes. An example that comes to mind is the four main characters that are brought up in the play. Vladimir and Estragon constantly argue with each other, with each conflict getting more and more heated, yet at the end of each act, they leave on good terms. Pozzo is also upset at Lucky a number of times during the first act, but when Pozzo begins to leave, he does not seem to treat Lucky in a terrible manner, compared to the beginning of their scenes during the first act. 

7. This play is not cynical, although you could argue that some of the characters can have tendencies to act cynical. Didi does seem a little bit cynical, due to the fact that he ignores some demands that Gogo makes, and instead, focuses on himself and waiting for Godot. Pozzo also has some cynical tendencies, because he does not care much for Lucky's well-being, but maybe he indirectly cares or just does not show his worry that much. People are insecure because they worry about how they look towards other people. They want to showcase their perfect self, and any shortage of that perfection results in them worrying that they do not seem "ideal" or "cool" for others to be around. If someone happens to be insecure, they tend to act out A LOT from their insecurity. For example, if someone is insecure about their acne, they can either treat it like a joke or get overly emotional about their acne insecurities. It is just a way to take the shame out of your faults and turn it into something else. The opposite of insecurity would probably be confidence, because an antonym for someone unsure about themselves would be someone sure about themselves. 

Sunday, September 28, 2014

Quotes & Solutions to Overpopulation (from the book)

Quotes on Overpopulation/Relate to Overpopulation


“change in perspective will naturally lead us to begin to control our populations, save our forests, re-create community, and reduce our wasteful consumption” (Hartmann, 3).


“indigenous tribes of… did not overpopulate or destroy their world, even though.. more resources than they [actually] used” (Hartmann, 3).


“when enough people change the way they view things, solutions become evident, often in ways we couldn’t imagine” (Hartmann, 3).


“mammals- including humans- become less fertile and death rates increase when there is not enough food to sustain a local population” (Hartmann, 9).


“because there was more food, there could be more humans, and the human populations started growing faster” (Hartmann, 10).


“By making more croplands available, they were able to produce more food for humans, and the population of the world went from 500 million people around the year 1000 to the first billion living humans in 1800” (Hartmann, 12).


“The planet’s human population grew beyond the level that the Earth could sustain if humans were using only local “current sunlight” as an energy and food source” (Hartmann, 13).


“the availability of a fuel leads to a population that depends on it and will suffer if it is taken away” (Hartmann, 13).


“While it had taken us 200,000 years to produce our first billion people, and 130 years to produce our second billion, the third billion took just 30 years” (Hartmann, 14).


“In 1960, world human population hit three billion” and “It took just fourteen years, from 1960 to 1974, for us to grow to four billion humans worldwide” (Hartmann, 14).


“We added another billion in just thirteen years, hitting five billion in 1987, and our next billion took only twelve years, as the world’s human population hit six billion in 1999” (Hartmann, 15).


“By the fifth billion, in 1987, humans became the most numerous species on Earth” (Hartmann, 15).


“Around 1990, we became the most numerous mammalian species on the planet, outnumbering even rats” and “there is now more human flesh on the planet than there is of any other single species” (15).


“We now consume more than 40 percent of the world’s total “net primary productivity” (NPP)” (Hartmann, 15).


“We consume more than 50 percent of the planet’s available fresh water. This means that every other species of plant and animal on the planet must now compete against one another for what little we’ve left” (Hartmann, 15).


“In less than a tenth of a percent of the total history of humanity, we’ve experienced over 90 percent of the total growth of the human population” (Hartmann, 15).


“At the current rate of growth, we would hit 10 billion people in 2030, 20 billion by 2070, and 80 billion by 2150” (Hartmann, 15-16).


"But nobody expects this rate to continue: there simply isn't enough food that can be produced" (Hartmann, 16).


"the fact that our current growth rate cannot continue is not in dispute" (Hartmann, 16).


"created this overcrowded world of overtaxed resources by consuming ancient sunlight" (Hartmann, 16).


"without oil and coal, however, the other five billion would starve" (Hartmann, 16).


"we'll be adding another billion humans to the planet over the next dozen years, while China, India, Mexico, and the rest of the Third World are industrializing" (Hartmann, 19).


"our planet's use is increasing far faster than "current rates of consumption," and our reserves will not last as long as the optimists are suggesting" (Hartmann, 19).


"obviously a collision coming between our growing population, with its increasing consumption of dwindling supplies of ancient sunlight, and our ability to sustain that population" (Hartmann, 19).


"even in alternative energy sources are developed, they may actually worsen the problem (by adding more people) if our culture doesn't change along with them" (Hartmann, 83).
"the most populous nation on Earth had to import food to feed herself, and it sent shocks through the world's grain markets" (Hartmann, 89).


"China's need for imported grain will grow from a few million tons to over 200 million, and perhaps as much as 300 million tons [over the next 20 years]" (Hartmann, 89).


"When China becomes hungry over the next few years, her need for food will rock world food prices" (Hartmann, 89).


"Food may well become the commodity that's scarce long before oil dries up" (Hartmann, 89).
"the decline of [many] civilizations [are] linked in the historical record to their population outstripping their available fuel" (Hartmann, 108).


"now that we have all these people dependent on a particular fuel, what happens when it runs low?" (Hartmann, 109).


"in places like Haiti, where exploding populations have collided with limited fuel supplies and led to widespread poverty and hunger" (Hartmann, 114).


"every "modern" civilization over the past seven thousand years has been crippled and then destroyed by a shortfall in their primary fuel supply. Our civilization may or may not elude the same fate" (Hartmann, 115).


"even that "poverty-level" rate of resource consumption is something the planet cannot sustain without our burning up carbon fuel resources that will be exhausted within a generation or two" (Hartmann, 119).


"Perhaps it's too late... to avoid all (italicize all) of the damage, [but] we can plant the seeds of a positive and hopeful world" (Hartmann, 119-20).


"there were 3,038,930,391 humans on Earth. That year saw the addition of 40,622,370 people-each one requiring three meals a day, several gallons of water a day from drinking and bathing, and a place to live" (Hartmann, 139).


"struggled to keep up with and meet the needs of these 40-plus million new Earth citizens, in 1961 another 56,007,855 more people were born than died" (Hartmann, 139).


"in 1962 we increased the world's population by another 69,393,370" (Hartmann, 139).
"1963 saw another 70,987,231 humans competing for food, water, shelter, and heat of our planet" (Hartmann, 139).


"the three years between the time John Kennedy was sworn in [until] the day he was shot... more people than the entire population of the United States were added to the world" (Hartmann, 140).


"today there are about twice as many people on Earth as in 1960" (Hartmann, 140).


"Cycles of boom-and-bust... are normal (italicize normal) for population-dense [city-states]" (Hartmann, 193).


"the most powerful and wealthy individuals aggregate and consume more and more of the resources available to the city-state, [leaving] less and less for those on the bottom" (Hartmann, 199).


"they [tribes] simple don't overpopulate, and nobody knows exactly why" (Hartmann, 207).


"in most tribal cultures, women hold positions of status and power equal to that of men" (Hartmann, 209).


"tribal populations are stable in a way that reflects the available resources in their environment" (Hartmann, 209).


"While it is true that these countries and others have succeeded in stopping [runaway growth] of their population... they are still [consuming vastly more resources than they produce]" (Hartmann, 210).


"all city-state governments dependent on oil and/or growth are inherently unstable in the long run" (Hartmann, 210).


"If things don't change soon, it will grow and consume until there is nothing left to consume, and then our culture and our ecosystems will collapse, leaving billions of starving humans, polluted soil, air, and waters, and millions of dead species in its wake" (Hartmann, 212).


"we can change direction and create a sustainable and livable future for at least a portion of the planet" (Hartmann, 212)


Question #2: Cite any solutions to the problem or issue.


"We can begin to use our remaining oil to help us develop the next energy solution" (Hartmann, 231).


"Conservation is something we can all begin now, and this will the rate of planetary deterioration" (Hartmann, 231).


"populations are exploding in almost every nation of the world where women are dominated. The men [are] making the decisions, and one of the male values is "Have sex whenever you want, with whomever you want" (Hartmann, 272).


"nations where women have relatively equal position and power with men, there are lower birth rates, often equal to the point of zero population growth" (Hartmann, 272).


"we must [rediscover] where the point of "enough" is" (Hartmann, 278).


"let's use what energy resources we have to develop renewable alternatives" (Hartmann, 293).


"True and lasting solutions will require that a critical mass of people achieve an Older Culture way of viewing the world" (Hartmann, 352).


"change your ways of living and consuming" (Hartmann, 356).

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Notes from Naomi Klein?

On September 18, 2014, Naomi Klein was interviewed by two hosts from Democracy Now!, an independent news company focused on providing real, reliable, and resourceful news. This particular interview had Ms. Klein give her thoughts on climate change, being a mom in this modern world, and a few other topics.

While there were no direct quotes of Klein mentioning the topic of overpopulation, there were a few sayings that she mentioned that could be used in our presentation on overpopulation:


  • Countries will only change if they notice other countries starting to change. (exception: China has implemented a one-child policy, but no one else has enforced this type of policy.)
  • Our economy needs to start supporting people that need help thriving in this country, or else there will be a problem between the rich and poor.
Naomi Klein's interview was quite insightful, but it only helped our presentation a little bit.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Overpopulation Thoughts

Chlyde Felicitas
9/16/14
Eng 1A

Overpopulation

The planet that we live in is a special place. We are able to continue living here, and not in other planets, because this land contains the resources that we need to exist. Unfortunately, these resources' supply is starting to wither down into low levels, which is hard to restock because these natural resources were left on the planet, and it is near impossible to recreate a natural resource. If more people were to exist on the planet, there is an uncertainty if everyone could continue living due to less support from the world. It is a problem if there is a surplus of people existing on the planet because being able to support a growing population will become increasingly difficult.

A number of organizations have predicted that attempting to support a continually growing human population will lead to expending more resources and energy than ever before, resulting in shortages and the destruction of mankind. The United Nations and the United Kingdom have both voiced their opinions about how populations that continue to grow will eventually run out of supplies to cover and support everyone. Other reports by different groups have also mentioned how our current rates of consumption happen to outweigh the amount of people that exist in the world, which is a big problem. Even if it seems that our planet can handle an ever growing population, we still have natural resources with a definite supply. 

Having too many people involved in the workforce can spread resources way too thin, which is not that good for our planet's resources in the long run. Every person does need some amount of income to live in this world, but the amount that people consume products in the world is very subjective, difficult to fully identify, and is a problem that is not easy to resolve. While it would seem simple that solving the problem of consumption is to consume less, it is difficult for adjustments to be suddenly made like that, especially since humans are used to the way they live their lives.

With the way that the world is living, populating, and consuming right now, it is only a matter of time before the resources that we have been so accustomed to using run low, or even worse, run out. There needs to be changes made to how many people exist in the world or how much resources are being used in order to continue remaining on the great land we live on. While we do need to take measures into halting a gigantic growth in people surviving on the planet or reducing the amount everyone consumes (from the least to most well-off), there first needs to be a general realization that overpopulation is a problem that needs to be solved.

Works Cited List
Kunzig, Robert. "By 2045 Global Population Is Projected To Reach Nine Billion. Can The Planet Take The Strain? (Cover Story)."National Geographic 219.1 (2011): 36. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 16 Sept. 2014.
Nicholson-Lord, David. "Planet Overload. (Cover Story)." New Statesman 138.4939 (2009): 24. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 16 Sept. 2014.
"Is Overpopulation a Global Crisis?" The Premier Online Debate Website. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Sept. 2014.

Thursday, September 4, 2014

Topics&Quotes

Topic #1: Information age or deficit?

The quote that I chose for this topic was: "we're living in an age of knowledge scarcity" (Hartmann, 126). Another quote that I also wanted to add was "we are out of touch with reality and are also..." (Hartmann, 126).


Topic #2: Oil is needed to make non-oil things?

The quote that I chose for this topic was: "how we produce the solar cells depends on oil" (Hartmann, 111).


Topic #3: Everyone is drugged up on something?

The quote that I chose for this topic was: "desirable to get people addicted" (Hartmann, 128). Another good quote that I also wanted to add was "most pervasive and most insidious drugging agent is television" (Hartmann, 130).

-Chlyde Felicitas

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Climate Change Thoughts

Links: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zFruNyiUHQ, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpTHi7O66pI

I watched both of these clips based on climate change and while both links are different (one is a debate, while the other is a TEDTalk), they both brought up points that need to be addressed.


  • As a country, we need to figure out what we are doing to accelerate/help cause these climate-changing problems. One side thinks that climate changed is caused by this, while one side completely disagrees with that idea. 
  • By enacting little or big changes, we can prevent or at least delay the amount of damage that our lands are currently experiencing. While some people believe that we need to tackle everything at once, skeptics believe that handling everything would cause more economic downfall. I am more in favor of enforcing small changes to counteract what is wrong because of convenience and frugality. ( I would not want to spend too much money on the planet.) 

-Chlyde Felicitas